Legal Opinion

State v. Tait

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2003PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

We granted this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure to determine whether, in a prosecution commenced by an arrest warrant for driving under the influence of an intoxicant, the resulting indictment may charge the defendant for offenses that can be inferred from the arrest warrant. The arrest warrant charged the appellant, Robert Tait, with driving under the influence of an intoxicant, and the grand jury indicted him for that offense (count one) 2 and for driving with a blood-alcohol concentration of .10 percent or more (count two). 3…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. PearsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. UtleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Glover P. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Wallace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. FerranteTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Jose Rodriguez a.k.a. Alex Lopez v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API