Legal Opinion

Carter v. Marshall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 3, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-365PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

FLANNERY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for, inter alia, lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs, employees of the United States Department of Labor, allege claims of discrimination because of their race, sex, and age under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The defendants include the Secretary and other officials of the Department of Labor.

The first ground for dismissal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. LaChapelle v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Royal E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Stewart v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  3. Ventura v. Bebo Foods, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Ellis v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API