Legal Opinion
State v. Serstock
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 10, 1986No. C3-86-264PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
The State of Minnesota appeals from an order dismissing an indictment charging three counts of misconduct by a public officer arising out of respondent Emanuel Serstock’s alleged “ticket fixing.” We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for trial.
FACTS
Serstock was the Deputy City Attorney for the City of Minneapolis from 1975 until October 1985. During that time, he had complete supervisory authority over the city’s prosecution of criminal offenses. As a result of alleged “ticket fixing” activities, Serstock was indicted by a grand jury for violating the public…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. SerstockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986