Legal Opinion
State v. Serstock
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 10, 1986No. C3-86-264Published
1Opinion of the Court
390 N.W.2d 399 (1986)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Emanuel A. SERSTOCK, Respondent.
No. C3-86-264.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 22, 1986.
Review Granted September 10, 1986.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Thomas L. Fabel, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary Magnuson, Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for appellant.
David G. Roston, Segal & Roston, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and PARKER and FORSBERG, JJ.
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
The State of Minnesota appeals from an order dismissing an indictment charging three counts of misconduct by a public officer…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.