Legal Opinion

Lollar v. Tankersley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 29, 1993No. 1910738PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

613 So.2d 1249 (1993)

James LOLLAR and Brenda G. Lollar

v.

Dr. Felix M. TANKERSLEY.

1910738.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 29, 1993.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1993.

Stephen M. Langham, Prattville, for appellants.

Charles A. Stakely of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, Montgomery, and T.O. McDowell, Prattville, for appellee.

2Per curiam

James and Brenda Lollar appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Dr. Felix Tankersley on their claims alleging medical malpractice. We affirm.

On September 15, 1989, Brenda Lollar was examined by Dr. Tankersley, a licensed, board-certified obstetrician, who concluded that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Porter v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gentry v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Coveleski v. BubnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Rodgers v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Hamilton v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Carruth v. Pittway Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API