Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Scott
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 18, 2012No. 1100192PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
PARKER, Justice.
This Court’s opinion of February 17, 2012, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.
Amy Hamilton, individually and on behalf of her stillborn son, sued Dr. John Blakely Isbell, Dr. Steven Coulter, Dr. Warren Scott, and the Isbell Medical Group (“IMG”) (Dr. Isbell, Dr. Coulter, Dr. Scott, and IMG are hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as “the defendants”), as well as several fictitiously named defendants, claiming that their negligent and wanton acts had wrongfully caused the death of her son and also caused her to suffer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MKB Management Corp. v. Wayne StenehjemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Edwards v. BeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Standifer v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Memphis Center for Reprod. Health v. Herbert Slatery, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.