Legal Opinion

Carruth v. Pittway Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1994No. 1920904, 1920905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Coy Carruth and others, appeal from summary judgments in these two cases.

These cases involve a fire at the home of Coy Carruth and his wife, Shirley Carruth. The plaintiffs, as the administrators of the estates of seven Carruth family members who perished in the fire, brought wrongful death actions against the manufacturer of the Carruths' smoke detector, Pittway Corporation. The actions were based on the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine ("AEMLD"), and on theories of negligent failure to adequately warn.

In the interest of brevity, our discussion will focus on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Pittway Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Keck v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Rowson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  5. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. GregorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API