Legal Opinion

Hornaday v. Hornaday

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1949No. Civ. 17209; Civ. 17208; Civ. 17274; Civ. 17273Published

1Opinion of the Court

95 Cal.App.2d 384 (1949)

PATRICIA LEE HORNADAY, Appellant,

v.

MARY B. HORNADAY, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 17209.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Dec. 28, 1949.

Jennings & Belcher, Stevens Fargo and Louis E. Kearney for Appellants.

Bailie, Turner & Lake and H. A. Gebhardt for Respondents.

H. A. Gebhardt, Bailie, Turner & Lake and Norman A. Bailie for Respondents.

MOORE, P. J.

The question for decision is whether attorney's fees paid by the guardian of a minor's estate for services in effecting the removal of his predecessor in office may be recovered from…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Estate of ReadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API