Legal Opinion

Bell Federal Credit Union v. Christianson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1991No. 90-291PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Bell Federal Credit Union (Bell) appeals a district court holding that Bell’s striking employees were eligible for unemployment benefits because Bell did not suffer a “stoppage of work” as that phrase is used in the Employment Security Law.

We reverse the holding and remand this cause for further proceedings because the district court for Douglas County used the wrong standard of review and because this court has concluded that as a matter of law, it cannot be said that a work stoppage did or did not occur.

Bell’s three assignments of error in substance allege that the district court erred in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Company v. HatcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. George A. Hormel and Co. v. HairNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. IBP, Inc. v. AanensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Slack Nursing Home, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ventura v. State of Nebraska Equal Opportunity CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lynch v. NEBRASKA DEPT. OF CORR. SERVICESNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bell Federal Credit Union v. ChristiansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API