Legal Opinion

George A. Hormel and Co. v. Hair

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1988No. 87-793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gitnick, D.J.

This action involves an appeal from the judgment of the district court for Dodge County, which had affirmed the decision of the Nebraska Appeal Tribunal allowing unemployment compensation benefits to the claimants.

This appeal requires us to examine the activities of certain employees, hereinafter claimants, of George A. Hormel and Company, hereinafter Hormel, and of Hormel, which operates a meatpacking plant in Fremont, Nebraska, to determine if the activities of the claimants constituted a work stoppage and whether the claimants were improperly awarded benefits to which they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Magner v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. TomkoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  5. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giant Food, Inc. v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Bell Federal Credit Union v. ChristiansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bell Federal Credit Union v. ChristiansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. IBP, Inc. v. AanensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Robinson v. Commissioner of LaborNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API