Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bowling v. National Can Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1996No. 94-2360PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks to compel an award of permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. The commission seeks to uphold its order as is. For the reasons to follow, we find in the commission’s favor.

Medically, Dr. Kackley anchors the commission’s conclusion that claimant is physically capable of sustained remunerative employment. Equally important, the only evidence that claimant’s psychological condition was work-prohibitive was properly rejected by the commission. Thus, there was “some evidence” supporting the commission’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barnett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Tradesman Internatl. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Bowling v. Natl. Can Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Gibbs v. Thistledown, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API