Legal Opinion

Chunestudy v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 4, 2014No. CR-13-214PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

|]In 2011, appellant Joseph Chunestudy was found guilty by a jury of rape and sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirmed. Chunestudy v. State, 2012 Ark. 222, 408 S.W.3d 55.

Subsequently, appellant timely filed in the trial court a verified, pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2011). The trial court denied the petition after holding a hearing. Appellant brings this appeal.

In his petition, appellant alleged that he was not afforded effective assistance of counsel at trial. This court has held that it will reverse the trial court’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Sartin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Sherman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Walden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. McNichols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Stalnaker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API