Legal Opinion

Abreu v. Ramirez

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 25, 2003No. CV-02-4093-GAF (JWJ)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

JOHNSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has screened the FAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 and 1915A, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (codified in sections of Titles 18, 28 and 42 of the United States Code), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Central District of California and, because Plaintiff has been granted leave to file this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andonagui v. May Dept. Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Martinez v. Marin Sanitary ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Andonagui v. May Department Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Dela Torre v. County of FresnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Dela Torre v. County of FresnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API