Legal Opinion

Lee v. Kritzman

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 26, 1975No. CV 75-67-FPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, District Judge.

On January 8, 1975, plaintiff filed suit against the Clerk of this court, contending that he had improperly refused to accept plaintiff’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Plaintiff seeks an injunction against the enforcement of the local court rule by dint of which the Clerk rejected his petition. The relevant facts are as follows.

1. Local Rule 19 (a) 1 of this court requires that all habeas corpus petitions shall be on forms supplied by the court. General Order 144 adopts the specific form approved by the court. Copies of the Rule, the relevant amendment, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Tony Fernandez v. Raymond W. Meier, Anthony Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Donald R. Hooker v. United States District Court, Central District of California, Hon. Leon R. Yankwich, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peace v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1988
  2. (PC) Dauwalder v. MoellerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API