Legal Opinion

State v. Bean

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1934No. 30,051PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of the crime, a misdemeanor, of unlawfully making and issuing an insurance policy contrary to law. 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 3762.

The contract in question was sold by Mr. Bean as agent for the Fidelity Mutual Association, a corporation under the laws of this state, which has not complied with the statutes relating to domestic insurance companies. The contract was issued to one Fink, who paid for it $28.50. The term of its coverage was two years and the general subject thereof the use 'by Mr. Fink of an automobile. The issuing company obligated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Physicians' Defense Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benevolent Burial Ass'n v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. State v. BeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API