Legal Opinion
Benevolent Burial Ass'n v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 3, 1935No. 10577PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The statute invoked by the' defendant in its motion to dismiss has no application to a ease of this kind. The petition alleged that the defendant was chartered by the superior court and was not an insurance company. Whatever else might be said of the act of 1914 (Ga. Laws 1914, p. 135, Park’s Code (1914), § 2442(g), Code of 1933, § 56-223), it does not apply to a company which is chartered by a superior court and which is not authorized by law to do an insurance business in this State. This section was intended to protect legitimate insurance companies against a receivership until…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Hill v. John P. King Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- State v. WillettIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Coleman v. Wichita Mutual Burial Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Moorefield v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wolverine Insurance v. Jack Jordan, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Brooke v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World v. HeflinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Clark v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.