Legal Opinion

People v. O.D.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 2013No. A136370PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUMES, J.

O.D. appeals from juvenile court orders finding that he committed first degree burglary and declaring him to be a ward of the court. He argues that the court wrongly admitted expert testimony about a palm print implicating him in the burglary and that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the burglary finding. We disagree and affirm.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

On October 30, 2009, Marlene R. left her Antioch house at 7:30 a.m. after making sure the doors and windows were locked. When she returned at 3:30 that afternoon, she found “mail strewn about in the entryway…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Daveggio & MichaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. RivasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. AzconaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. AzconaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API