Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Griffith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1922No. 10,633PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Johnson Circuit Court; Fremont Miller, Judge. Action by William B. Griffith against Thomas B. Thompson and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The complaint by appellee was for damages for breach of a contract of sale of real estate, which contract is made a part of the complaint, and in which contract the real estate involved is described as follows, to wit: “The southwest quarter (¼) of the southeast quarter of Section 23, 12,' 3 containing 40 acres more or less. Also part of the west half of the northeast quarter of Section 26,12, 3 containing 43.62 acres, more or less.” It will be observed that the last description *61is indefinite. In the complaint, it consists of two tracts by metes and bounds, one containing 14⅛ acres, and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Howard v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Colerick v. HooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Pulse v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burrows v. SealeTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Schuler v. GrafIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Wilson v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API