Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Wilson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1931PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

Plaintiff’s automobile, in which the plaintiff’s testatrix was a passenger, came into collision with an automobile operated by the defendant. The collision caused some noise or “ grating sound.” The left fender of plaintiff’s car was loosened from the running board. The plaintiff’s testatrix stepped from the automobile and started to write down the defendant’s name and license number. While doing so, she fainted and fell to the sidewalk, fracturing her skull. All this occurred within a few minutes after the accident. She lived about twenty minutes after the fall. The plaintiff, claiming that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Homans v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Warren v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Battalla v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API