Legal Opinion
Laurel Capital Group, Inc. v. BT Financial Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-311JPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.
Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Laurel Capital Savings Group, Inc. and Laurel Savings Bank (“Plaintiffs”) have requested partial summary judgment on their trademark infringement action under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). Defendants BT Financial Corporation and Laurel Bank (“Defendants”) have filed a competing motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, I will grant the Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and deny the Defendants’ motion. As explained infra, the precise…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brown & Brown, Inc. v. ColaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Globalaw Ltd. v. Carmon & Carmon Law OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Lebewohl v. Heart Attack Grill LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- JTH Tax, Inc. v. H & R Block Eastern Tax Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.