Legal Opinion
Smith v. Petkovich
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 12, 2008No. 1:06 CV 00467PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LESLEY WELLS, District Judge.
On 1 March 2006, Petitioner Paul Smith (“Mr.Smith”) filed this timely habeas, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 2254, setting forth the following three grounds for relief:
A. Ground one: Mr. Smith was denied his right to confrontation of witnesses under the Sixth Amendment because the trial court permitted testimony about the out-of-court statements of a non-testifying person.
B. Ground two: Mr. Smith received a ten-year sentencing enhancement as a Repeat violent Offender pursuant to O.R.C. 2929.14 and 2941.145, which are violative of the Sixth…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Stalnaker v. BobbyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- State v. HopsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018