State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTimothy P. Cannon, J.
{¶ 108} I dissent from the majority's opinion as it relates to appellant's second assignment of error, which asserts the trial court erred in its imposition of sentence on the repeat violent offender specification. The assignment of error has merit.
{¶ 109} When a repeat violent offender specification is properly alleged in an indictment, it is the trial court's duty to initially determine the issue of whether an offender should be designated a repeat violent offender ("RVO"). R.C. 2941.149(B). In State v. Hunter , the case cited by the majority in support of its holding, the defendant waived…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.