Legal Opinion

State v. Ruff

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1997No. COA96-1510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In this appeal, the defendant contests only the sentencing phase of his trial. He contends that trial court erred in: (1) finding as an aggravating factor that the offenses he committed were done with premeditation and deliberation; (2) failing to find as a mitigating factor that he was a person of good character and reputation in his community; (3) failing to find as a mitigating factor that he was suffering from a mental condition that significantly reduced his culpability for the offenses committed; and (4) applying North Carolina’s Firearm Enhancement Statute to aggravate his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. MisenheimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. BarnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. LattimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. RuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API