Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Church of the Open Door

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2008No. 08CA009387PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

{¶ 1} Gary McNaughton conned Rich and Trina Johnson out of over a million dollars by convincing them to invest in a Ponzi scheme and cosign on a commercial loan. The Johnsons sued, among others, Pastor Tim Guenther and the Church of the Open Door (the “Church”) because they introduced the Johnsons to McNaughton and recommended investing with him. The trial court granted Guenther and the Church summary judgment. Because the Johnsons were not justified in relying on what Guenther told them about McNaughton’s program, this court affirms the trial court’s judgment on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Delman v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Federated Management Co. v. Coopers & LybrandOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zhelezny v. OleshOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Pharos Capital Partners, L.P. v. Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Investment LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Risner v. Regal Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. Roberts v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API