Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Shook & Fletcher Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1944No. 6 Div. 79PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit was on an alleged oral contract against several defendants for hauling iron ■ore.

The complaint was amended several times on the trial. The evidence was closed and argument had to the court on questions concluding plaintiff’s right of recovery, and the court’s decision announced for the defendant. The fourth amendment on which the trial was had charged a joint oral contract entered into by the plaintiffs and the defendants for hauling two and one-half million tons of ore from defendants’ leased lands and washer. A motion, which was argued, was made by defendants to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Alabama Mills, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Carney v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Wheeler v. McGuire, Scoggins & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Shenandoah Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Stevens v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. British General Insurance Co. v. Simpson Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API