Legal Opinion
Nash v. Auburn University
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 16, 1987No. 85-7675PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
812 F.2d 655
38 Ed. Law Rep. 47
David M. NASH and Donna C. Perry, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AUBURN UNIVERSITY, Frank G. Vice, J.T. Vaughan, H.C. Morgan
and James E. Martin, individually and in their
official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 85-7675.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
March 16, 1987.
1
McPhillips, DeBardelaben & Hawthorne, Julian McPhillips, Griffin Sikes, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.
2
David R. Boyd, Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, Ala., Thomas D. Samford, III, Samford & Samford, Opelika, Ala., Joseph C. Espy, III, Melton & Espy, P.C., Montgomery, Ala., for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Doe v. David BaumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Lopez v. Bay Shore Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- McAlpin v. BurnettDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001