Legal Opinion
Herman v. Mid-Atlantic Installation Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 27, 2000No. Civil Action S-97-4238PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, District Judge.
Alexis Herman, the Secretary of Labor, has brought suit against the defendants, cable television providers (“Comcast”) 1 and cable installation companies (“MAT”) 2 , alleging that the individuals MAT utilizes to install Comcast cable systems in customer homes (“Installers”) are employees and not independent contractors, and hence are entitled to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The defendants have moved for summary judgment, arguing that under the undisputed facts of the case the Installers are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heath v. Perdue Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Wilson v. ClancyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Schultz v. Capital International Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Michael Scantland v. Jeffry Knight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Quinteros v. Sparkle Cleaning, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- McFeeley v. Jackson Street Entertainment, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Jacobson v. Comcast Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.