Legal Opinion

Computer Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1996No. A8612-07746; CA A74597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*278DEITS, P. J.

In Computer Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 137 Or App 572, 905 P2d 1177 (1995), rev den 323 Or 153 (1996), we affirmed the part of the judgment holding defendants Brandt, McDevitt and Peter Murphy, Sr.’s, personal representative (Murphy) liable to plaintiffs under the Oregon Securities Law. ORS chapter 59. We reversed the part of the judgment holding Murphy liable under the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO). ORS 166.715 to ORS 166.735. Plaintiffs now petition for an award of $212,002 in attorney fees on appeal from the defendants jointly.1

Plaintiffs rely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of Wesley E. Smith v. WareOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. North Marion School District 15 v. Acstar InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API