Legal Opinion

Computer Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1995No. A8612-07746; CA A74597PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendants Brandt, McDevitt and Peter Murphy, Sr. (Murphy), 1 appearing separately, appeal from the judgments against them in this action under the Oregon Securities Law, ORS chapter 59, and the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO). ORS 166.715 to 166.735. We reverse in part as to Murphy, and affirm in all other respects.

In a previous appeal, the Oregon Supreme Court reversed and remanded the trial court’s summary judgment for defendants on the securities law claims and its concomitant dismissal of the ORICO claims. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 310 Or 706,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ince v. AMEV Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ainslie v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Anderson v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Anderson v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Castle v. RitaccoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API