Legal Opinion

Estate of Wesley E. Smith v. Ware

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1989No. TC 16-85-08831; CA A46218; SC S35614PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

The sole issue concerns attorney fees to which defendant may be entitled under ORS 646.638(3).

Plaintiffs 2 alleged that defendant misrepresented the existence of a septic system on property purchased from defendant. Their complaint pleaded claims for fraud and unlawful trade practices. See ORS 646.608. Plaintiffs also asked for attorney fees based on ORS 646.638(3).

Defendant contested plaintiffs’ claims. Defendant also counterclaimed for attorney fees under ORS 646.638(3) on the basis that plaintiffs’ unlawful trade practices claim was “frivolous.” 3

Defendant prevailed at trial on both the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Estate of Smith v. WareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance v. TrutanichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Bennett v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Greb v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Freedland v. TrebesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API