Legal Opinion

In re Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 2000No. B133998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.—

Introduction

In this matter the petitioner was convicted of escape pursuant to a plea bargain which included a provision for presentence credit. After the sentence was entered, the Department of Corrections informed the trial court that petitioner is not entitled to presentence credit because petitioner was serving a prior prison sentence when he was sentenced here. Without holding a hearing, the trial court amended its sentence, striking the provision for presentence credit. Petitioner contends that the trial court had no jurisdiction to amend the sentence and is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LetteerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. Avignone, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. AllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. People v. AvignoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API