Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 23, 2013No. 20120957-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decision

2Per curiam

T1 David C. Coleman appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to reinstate the time to file a direct appeal pursuant to rule 4(f) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. The trial court denied Coleman's motion as untimely. We affirm on other grounds. 1

12 Coleman pleaded guilty to two charges and was sentenced in March 2007. In August 2012, he filed a motion to reinstate the time to file a direct appeal pursuant to rule 4(f). Under rule 4(f), a defendant…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manning v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RhinehartUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. RynhartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. KaborCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. State v. TaufuiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API