State v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Decision
2Per curiam
T1 David C. Coleman appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to reinstate the time to file a direct appeal pursuant to rule 4(f) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. The trial court denied Coleman's motion as untimely. We affirm on other grounds. 1
12 Coleman pleaded guilty to two charges and was sentenced in March 2007. In August 2012, he filed a motion to reinstate the time to file a direct appeal pursuant to rule 4(f). Under rule 4(f), a defendant…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Manning v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RhinehartUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RynhartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KaborCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
4Cited by3 opinions
- State v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. TaufuiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015