Legal Opinion

State v. Rynhart

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2005No. 20040115PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Tanja Rynhart was arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance after police officers discovered a small bag of cocaine in her purse. At the time of the discovery, Rynhart’s purse was in her van, which she had left unattended in a marsh after driving off the road and crashing through two fences. Rynhart filed a motion to suppress the cocaine, arguing that the police officer illegally searched her van in violation of her rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The State argued that the search was valid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HalesUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  4. State v. HarryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  5. State v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API