Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Parker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1924No. Docket No. 4932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

The plaintiff sued to condemn a certain strip of land in the city of Oakland to be used for the purpose of a public street. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury. Findings and judgment were entered condemning the land for the purposes mentioned and the plaintiff paid into court the sum awarded to the defendant, W. M. Greuner. From this judgment said defendant prosecutes this appeal upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

In his opening brief the-appellant advances four grounds of attack upon the judgment which we will consider in the order presented:(1) That the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. People v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API