Blake v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from order at special term, directing a readjustment of costs, on a motion for consolidation.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court—Hogeboom, Justice.
The order made at special term should he affirmed. There is. but a single suit pending, and the costs of only a single suit can be included in the judgment. It is not the case of several parties defending by separate attorneys and having separate interests, in which event separate bills of costs are sometimes allowed, (Code, § 306), Put one plaintiff against one defendant, in a single action. In such case I do not think the allowances authorized by section 307 can be repeated. That section makes a specific allowance for particular services, which cannot be…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hull v. ShannonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- German National Bank v. J. D. Best & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Hiscox v. New Yorker Staats ZeitungNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- P. V. Baranowsky Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Kelley v. KelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.