Kelley v. Kelley
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action is the successor of two actions which were consolidated by an order granted and. entered October 1, 1921. Plaintiff succeeded at the trial, which took place October 17, 1921.
Here we must review the clerk’s determination on taxation of plaintiff’s costs, in which, after taxing a full bill in the consolidated action, he refused to tax any costs in the actions before consolidation.
The clerk must be sustained. When two or more actions are consolidated under the provisions of the Civil Practice Act, they are at an end and are deemed discontinued. No costs in those actions can be taxed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunning v. Bank of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Blake v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Hiscox v. New Yorker Staats ZeitungNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Cohen v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- German Exch. Bank v. KroderNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Connolly v. Connolly, New York County Courts1934
- Pankau v. CosorNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- McAllister v. DrislaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933