Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Dothan

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 19, 1988No. Civ. 6662PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Danny Shute, a firefighter for the City of Dothan (City), originated the case before us as a purported class action against the City on behalf of all employees of the City fire and police departments who have been denied salary benefits pursuant to a local regulation known as the "temporary detail rule." The Dothan Personnel Board, its members, the Dothan Personnel Department, and its director (hereinafter collectively Personnel) were added as defendants by amendment. After oral arguments on defendants' motions for summary judgment, Shute amended his complaint to add Irby Hall and Thurman…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hodges v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Marie Von Hoffburg v. Clifford Alexander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Patsy v. Florida International UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Talton Telecommunication Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Warren v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Danny W. TURNER v. Willie MOORECourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte Assoc. Fin. Serv. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API