Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sweeting

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1987No. 358PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a person who intended to possess and sell a controlled substance, who believed he was possessing and selling a controlled substance, and who in fact possessed and sold a controlled substance is entitled to be acquitted on charges of knowingly possessing and possessing with intent to deliver a controlled substance because he was mistaken about the precise chemical nature of the controlled substance.

In November, 1984, Brett W. Sweeting sold a small quantity of methamphetamine to Ranee Morey, an undercover state trooper, in Lycoming County. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. GorodetskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth v. YapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. People v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Com. v. Beatty, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. MohamudSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Com. v. Beatty, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Brehm, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API