Commonwealth v. Sweeting
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The issue in this appeal is whether a person who intended to possess and sell a controlled substance, who believed he was possessing and selling a controlled substance, and who in fact possessed and sold a controlled substance is entitled to be acquitted on charges of knowingly possessing and possessing with intent to deliver a controlled substance because he was mistaken about the precise chemical nature of the controlled substance.
In November, 1984, Brett W. Sweeting sold a small quantity of methamphetamine to Ranee Morey, an undercover state trooper, in Lycoming County. On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GorodetskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. YapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- People v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Com. v. Beatty, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MohamudSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Com. v. Beatty, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Brehm, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.