Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1928No. 25521PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover $15,000 in damages for alleged negligence resulting in the death of Joseph Ramirez. At the age of six years, November 5, 1925, he .fell into an uncovered manhole .to a sewer containing scalding water and steam and died as a result. The names of his father and mother were respectively Esteban Ramirez and Juana Ramirez. They resided.at the time in the body of a railroad boxcar from which the wheels and trucks had been removed. It stood on the ground in the railroad yards of the.Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company at Alliance, Nebraska. For the use of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. DraperNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Shults v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Spence v. Polenski Bros., Schellak & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Shults v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Markussen v. MengedohtNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Maloney v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Alton R. Wright, Special Administrator of the Estate of Tommy Lee Wright, Deceased v. Gailen D. Hoover and Earl R. HooverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Lane v. HatfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Gubalke Ex Rel. Gubalke v. Estate of AnthesNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API