Legal Opinion

Shults v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1912No. 17,132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albekt J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHamer, J.

As damages for a personal injury, the plaintiff recovered a judgment in the district court for Lancaster county against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company for $1,000 and costs. The railroad company has appealed. This is the second appeal. Shults v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 83 Neb. 272, contains the opinion of this court on the former appeal.

On private business of his own, the plaintiff went down into the freight yards of the defendant railroad company at Lincoln on February 28, 1906, and visited his two cousins, named Kimball, who were moving from Palmyra, Nebraska, to York,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shults v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kruntorad v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Rhode v. DuffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. St. Mary's Hospital v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Ramirez v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Griffis v. Village of BradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API