Legal Opinion
Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 11, 1965No. 538-59PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge: 2
In January 1953, plaintiff entered into two separate contracts with the Army, one for the production of elevating and traversing assemblies and the other for the manufacture of 75 mm. rifles. The present claims grow out of the termination of the former contract for the Government’s convenience.3 There are in effect two independent demands, one urged by the Acme Process Equipment Company as prime contractor for itself and all of its subcontractors save one, and the other on behalf of All Metals Industries, Inc., the principal subcontractor.
The contract out of which the claims…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- In the Matter of Double H Products Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Bankrupt. Appeal of the National State Bank, Elizabeth, N. JCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Keefe Co. v. Americable International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- General Dynamics Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.