Lopez v. Merced County, Cal.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before a three-judge court, under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”). 42 U.S.C. § 1973c (“Section 5”). Plaintiffs challenge numerous annexations, detachments, consolidations and/or formations to cities and special districts in the County of Merced, California, adopted since November 1, 1972. On November 21, 2006, Circuit Judge Jay S. Bybee and District Judges Oliver W. Wanger and Anthony W. Ishii, appointed to the three-judge panel by the Chief Judge of the Circuit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Sheffield Bd. of Comm'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.