Legal Opinion

Havird v. Columbia YMCA

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1992No. 1815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is a worker’s compensation case. Lodd Z. Havird filed a claim seeking total and permanent disability benefits for accidental injury to the vascular system of his legs. The single commissioner denied benefits and a reviewing panel of the full *398commission affirmed the order of the single commissioner. Havird appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed the commission’s decision. Havird appeals. We affirm.

Havird suffers from varicose veins, a vascular condition in which the valves in his outer leg veins do not function properly. The valves serve to maintain constant fluid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. DeBruhl v. Kershaw County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Capers v. FlauttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Richardson v. WELLMAN COMBING CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Creech v. Ducane Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Landry v. CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API