Legal Opinion
Muller v. Reagh
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1959No. Civ. 18338PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGLER, J. pro tem. *
We have before us now the third appeal taken by plaintiff in the case of William Muller v. Charles Reagh and Lelah Muller. Lelah Muller was at one time the wife of the plaintiff. As the result of a previous successful appeal herein (Muller v. Reagh, 150 Cal.App.2d 99 [309 P.2d 826]), appellant Muller recovered a judgment against the defendants for costs on appeal. In Muller v. Reagh, 170 Cal.App.2d 151 [338 P.2d 601] this court affirmed an order reducing the amount thereof from $262 to $91.50.
On December 7, 1954, the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dwan v. DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Pangborn Plumbing Corp. v. Carruthers & SkiffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- City & County of San Francisco v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.