Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 12, 2016PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Katherine A. Levine, J.
Plaintiff Vincent Jackson brings this action seeking damages against defendant law firm Abrams, Fensterman, et al. on the grounds that the law firm improperly terminated him as a chauffeur/driver, after he was hospitalized to insert a stent, in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (29 USC § 2601 et seq.), the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 290 et seq.), and the New York City Human Rights Law (City HRL) (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-101 et seq.). In its amended answer, the law firm denied…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLPCivil Court of the City of New York · 2016