Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 23, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Katherine A. Levine, J.

This case comes before this court on defendant law firm Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP’s motion for reconsideration. As one of its arguments, defendant contends that plaintiff Vincent Jackson cannot be considered an employee under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). For the reasons stated below, this court grants defendant’s motion for reconsideration and its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

By decision dated January 12, 2016, this court granted defendant partial summary judgment dismissing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Zheng v. Liberty Apparel Company Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Donnelly v. Greenburgh Central School District No. 7Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Plumley v. Southern Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API