Jackson v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Katherine A. Levine, J.
This case comes before this court on defendant law firm Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, LLP’s motion for reconsideration. As one of its arguments, defendant contends that plaintiff Vincent Jackson cannot be considered an employee under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). For the reasons stated below, this court grants defendant’s motion for reconsideration and its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
By decision dated January 12, 2016, this court granted defendant partial summary judgment dismissing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zheng v. Liberty Apparel Company Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Donnelly v. Greenburgh Central School District No. 7Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Plumley v. Southern Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.