Legal Opinion

Meyer v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided May 30, 2014No. 2:14-CV-29PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This is a medical malpractice claim brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and in the alternative for Summary Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff filed a Response (ECF No. 14) to *862which Defendant has filed a Reply (ECF No. 16). Having fully considered the arguments presented, the Court holds oral argument unnecessary for disposition of the motion.

At this stage, the Court need only answer one question: did Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Louise Drazan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. McIntyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Arroyo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Widmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API