Meyer v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This is a medical malpractice claim brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and in the alternative for Summary Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff filed a Response (ECF No. 14) to *862which Defendant has filed a Reply (ECF No. 16). Having fully considered the arguments presented, the Court holds oral argument unnecessary for disposition of the motion.
At this stage, the Court need only answer one question: did Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Louise Drazan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- McIntyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Arroyo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Widmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025