Legal Opinion
United States v. Rick R. Lacey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1981No. 80-2052PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Circuit Judge:
The defendant Lacey appeals from the revocation of his probation. Earlier, we remanded these proceedings because we found the findings upon which the revocation was based were inadequate to review Lacey’s contentions. 648 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1981). Although our decree was somewhat ambiguous, we intended that, upon the district court’s entering findings, the appellant could seek further review by filing a certified copy of the district court’s findings plus any supplementary briefs and materials, without the necessity of filing a new notice of appeal. See Chaney v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Henry Chaney v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James Edward GastonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Mario S. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Keith Alexander McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Dwaine CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Louis Distasio, Sr., United States of America v. Jerry J. DistasioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John Walter SparrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. David L. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.