Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Buck Consultants, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-1057PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Peter Pappas and Independent Insulating Glass Company brought suit against the former actuary of Independent Insulating Glass’s pension plan and the actuarial firm he works for, alleging that the actuary breached fiduciary duties under ERISA and asserting a private right of action arising from misrepresentations contained in forms submitted to federal authorities charged with regulating ERISA plans. In addition, Pappas and IIG (collectively “Pap-pas” or “plaintiffs”) alleged state-law professional malpractice, breaches of common-law fiduciary duties, and fraud. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Custer v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Martin v. FeilenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  5. Reich v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API