Legal Opinion

O'Daniel v. Stroud Na

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 24, 2008No. CIV. 05-5089-KESPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE

KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.

Defendants, Stroud NA (Stroud) and Judy Roosa, move to exclude all evidence of plaintiffs claims for lost profit damages or, in the alternative, to prohibit an award of prejudgment interest. Plaintiff, Perle O’Daniel, opposes the motion. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.

DISCUSSION

In his amended complaint, O’Daniel alleges that defendants engaged in negligent misrepresentation, negligent procurement, and fraud and deceit. In each count, O’Daniel asserts that as a result of defendants’ conduct, he…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kobbeman v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lazzara v. Howard A. Esser, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steineke v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Flexider USA Corporation v. RichmondDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API